A post from September 2011 on the differences between giving a critique (which is useful) and giving criticism (which is not).
I’ve been thinking quite a bit about critiques lately. That is not surprising, given I’ve been planning the release of my first novel. Once you publish anything, irrespective of your intentions, you open yourself to criticism.
Artists need to be thick-skinned.
That’s the mantra that every artist, every writer hears. And it’s true to some extent. However, there is a difference between criticism and critique, and one’s reaction to each should be expected to differ. To explore that, let’s look at the difference between the two.
The dictionary.com definition of criticism reads as follows:
“1. The act of passing judgment as to the merits of anything. 2. The act of passing severe judgment; censure; faultfinding.” A third definition reads, “The act or art of analyzing and evaluating or judging the quality of a literary or artistic work, musical performance, art exhibit, dramatic production, etc.”
If you look up…
View original post 1,781 more words